Beyond the Disease Label: Understanding Autism as a 'Difference'

PERSONAL CONNECTION

This paper was inspired by my cousin, who grew up in India with autism. His experience in a culture where it is deeply stigmatized encouraged me to look closer at how society defines difference. I remember how he would line up his toy cars in perfect rows and become absorbed in his own world, completely content. Yet many people around him saw that same world as something to correct.

​

Through my research, I wanted to understand where that misunderstanding begins. My cousin continues to remind me that difference can carry beauty, and that compassion begins with trying to see through someone else’s eyes. I think about him every day, and I hope that this work honors him, along with the many others in India whose stories remain unheard.

​

ABSTRACT

This research paper evaluates the classification of autism as a disease by examining the perspectives of individuals with autism, researchers, and medical professionals. It argues that autism should be recognized as a neurological difference that reflects the diversity of human development. The study also considers how language and classification shape public attitudes toward people on the spectrum. Adopting a perspective of inclusion and acceptance can lead to better understanding, support, and opportunity for those with autism.

Behind every section of this paper is a person like my cousin, whose experience reminds me that research carries a human weight as well as an academic one.

​

INTRODUCTION

Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by differences in communication, social interaction, and behavior. Over time, researchers have questioned whether it should be viewed as a disease or as a natural variation in the human brain.

​

For me, autism has never been only a definition. I think of my cousin’s quiet focus, the way he repeats melodies until they sound exactly right to him, and how he feels safest when his surroundings stay constant. These moments shaped the way I approach this topic.

​

This paper evaluates the disease label attributed to autism by examining its characteristics, causes, and social implications. It aims to explore how a change in language and understanding can reduce stigma and create a more inclusive view of human diversity.

​

CHARACTERISTICS OF AUTISM

Autism includes a wide range of behaviors and abilities. Each individual shows their own combination of strengths and challenges. Some may find social communication difficult, while others express themselves through patterns, music, or art.

​

My cousin struggles with direct conversation, yet he can recall details from books he read years ago. Observing him taught me that ability cannot be measured by one scale. The variation within the autism spectrum challenges the idea that difference must mean deficiency.

​

Understanding these characteristics as forms of individuality allows us to see autism as a dimension of human variation rather than a disease.

​

CAUSES OF AUTISM

The causes of autism are complex and still being studied. Research suggests that both genetic and environmental factors contribute to its development. No single explanation can capture every case.

​

When I discussed this with my aunt, she said she cared less about knowing why autism occurs and more about learning how to support her son. That perspective helped me realize that the search for causes should never overshadow the need for understanding.

​

The absence of a single disease-causing factor supports the view that autism reflects difference within the range of human biology.

​

SOCIETAL IMPLICATIONS

The way society labels autism affects how people respond to it. In many parts of India, limited awareness leads to stigma and isolation. I have seen children excluded from games and classrooms, not out of cruelty but uncertainty.

​

Changing how we describe autism can change how we treat those who live with it. Seeing autism as difference encourages schools and workplaces to adapt environments instead of expecting individuals to change who they are. It also invites more empathy in everyday interactions.

​

Each time I visit my cousin, I notice how much more confident he becomes when people speak to him with patience. Those small shifts in attitude are what inclusion looks like in practice.

​

PERSPECTIVES OF STAKEHOLDERS

The views of individuals with autism, researchers, and medical professionals help shape this discussion. Many autistic people prefer to be recognized for their abilities and identities rather than their diagnoses. Their experiences highlight the importance of listening to lived voices in research.

​

In conversations I have read and watched, people on the spectrum often emphasize that progress begins with respect. Medical professionals and educators are starting to adopt this view, focusing on support rather than correction.

​

Hearing these perspectives has reminded me that scientific progress is most meaningful when it reflects the people it aims to serve.

​

CONCLUSION

This paper evaluated the classification of autism as a disease and proposed a shift toward understanding it as a difference. The evidence from behavioral, genetic, and social studies shows that autism cannot be contained by one definition.

​

Writing this paper changed how I see research itself. It showed me that knowledge can heal not only through discovery but also through empathy. My cousin’s laughter, his routines, and his determination have given me a reason to study this field with both care and curiosity.

​

By viewing autism as a difference, we can begin to build a society that values each individual’s strengths and welcomes every form of mind.

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. https://repository.poltekkes-kaltim.ac.id/657/1/Diagnostic%20and%20statistical%20manual%20of%20mental%20disorders%20_%20DSM-5%20(%20PDFDrive.com%20).pdf 

​

Happé, F., & Ronald, A. (2008). The 'fractionable autism triad': A review of evidence from behavioural, genetic, cognitive and neural research. Neuropsychology Review, 18(4), 287 304. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18956240/.

 

Kenny, L., Hattersley, C., Molins, B., Buckley, C., Povey, C., & Pellicano, E. (2016). Which terms should be used to describe autism? Perspectives from the UK autism community. Autism, 20(4), 442-462. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26134030/.

 

Pellicano, E. (2013). Autism: A critical introduction to psychological theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge.

 

Silberman, S. (2015). NeuroTribes: The legacy of autism and the future of neurodiversity. New York, NY: Avery. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/598463.

​